I think that ship sailed decades ago. And, frankly, it's not like the vast majority of the rest of the media is particularly legitimate. If she can get 10 fox viewers to vote for her, or just not bother to vote, good.
I think that ship sailed decades ago. And, frankly, it's not like the vast majority of the rest of the media is particularly legitimate. If she can get 10 fox viewers to vote for her, or just not bother to vote, good.
Fox is worse than most networks (but not some ONN, etc.) but the vast majority of the news media is truly terrible - either corrupt, incompetent, or both.
I don't entirely get what we're disagreeing about here. Are you saying that because Fox is worse (than some) all of the other ones are completely legitimate? Sure, Fox got caught. That doesn't mean that the scumbags at the Wall Street Journal, or Newsmax, or the NYT, or Newsweek, or ONN, The Washington Post, etc. are all legitimate.
You shouldnтАЩt be making the comparison in the first place is the point. And youтАЩre wrong and NYT and WaPo are legitimate. What kind of godly journalistic standards do you have?
I think that ship sailed decades ago. And, frankly, it's not like the vast majority of the rest of the media is particularly legitimate. If she can get 10 fox viewers to vote for her, or just not bother to vote, good.
I kind of agree with both of you, but especially you.
You mean other stations have had to pay out nearly a billion dollars in damages for level?
Fox is worse than most networks (but not some ONN, etc.) but the vast majority of the news media is truly terrible - either corrupt, incompetent, or both.
Did they have to pay out nearly a billion in damages for pushing the lie that Trump really won the election?
I don't entirely get what we're disagreeing about here. Are you saying that because Fox is worse (than some) all of the other ones are completely legitimate? Sure, Fox got caught. That doesn't mean that the scumbags at the Wall Street Journal, or Newsmax, or the NYT, or Newsweek, or ONN, The Washington Post, etc. are all legitimate.
If youтАЩre talking about the Times and the Post, theyтАЩre in an entirely different category than Fox
I didn't say they were in the same category. I said they weren't "particularly legitimate", and I stand by that.
You shouldnтАЩt be making the comparison in the first place is the point. And youтАЩre wrong and NYT and WaPo are legitimate. What kind of godly journalistic standards do you have?