I don't entirely get what we're disagreeing about here. Are you saying that because Fox is worse (than some) all of the other ones are completely legitimate? Sure, Fox got caught. That doesn't mean that the scumbags at the Wall Street Journal, or Newsmax, or the NYT, or Newsweek, or ONN, The Washington Post, etc. are all legitimate.
You shouldnтАЩt be making the comparison in the first place is the point. And youтАЩre wrong and NYT and WaPo are legitimate. What kind of godly journalistic standards do you have?
Did they have to pay out nearly a billion in damages for pushing the lie that Trump really won the election?
I don't entirely get what we're disagreeing about here. Are you saying that because Fox is worse (than some) all of the other ones are completely legitimate? Sure, Fox got caught. That doesn't mean that the scumbags at the Wall Street Journal, or Newsmax, or the NYT, or Newsweek, or ONN, The Washington Post, etc. are all legitimate.
If youтАЩre talking about the Times and the Post, theyтАЩre in an entirely different category than Fox
I didn't say they were in the same category. I said they weren't "particularly legitimate", and I stand by that.
You shouldnтАЩt be making the comparison in the first place is the point. And youтАЩre wrong and NYT and WaPo are legitimate. What kind of godly journalistic standards do you have?