Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Noah's avatar

Following my analysis of the Democrats legislative future in yesterdays digest, I thought I would note what i think the Democrats strategy should be going forward.

In my opinion, we should take notes from Howard Dean's fifty-state strategy, as people all across the political system become increasingly disenfranchised with this Trump administration, and basically nothing doing well, we are set up for winning the house back for sure and it makes me think that we should invest largely into potential infrastructure in potential democratic states in ~50 years or 50 years ago, sort of something similar to the tea party movement but have candidates that suit the district they're running in whilst also having them being connected to crucial ideology of the democratic party. We can then move onto having progressives in deep blue seats, because then every caucus benefit of having democrats in congress whilst benefiting the main democrats agenda, representing every ideology in the broad tent party we are.

Would love to know your thoughts.

Kildere53's avatar

One quick note about the Maine special election: One reason why the Republican candidate got as close as she did may have been that she had a French last name while the Democratic candidate did not. Lewiston has a large Franco-American population, and these things really can make a difference.

I remember that in the early 2010s, there was a special election in Massachusetts, for a district south of Boston, an area with a lot of people of Irish descent. The Republican candidate had an Irish name - Patrick O'Connor - while the Democratic candidate did not. The district had voted for Obama, but the Republican won the special election, and I maintain to this day that he won because he had an Irish name while the Democrat did not.

23 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?