5 Comments
User's avatar
⭠ Return to thread
PollJunkie's avatar

The independent redistricting one insinuated that it would "gerrymander" the state.

Expand full comment
MPC's avatar
May 1Edited

Yep, and it was deliberately confusing enough that the "no" vote won. Had LaRose been forced to do an accurate summary, it would've gotten to a bare majority "yes".

LaRose and Yost are probably going to write something as misleading for the OH Voter Bill of Rights, probably something along the lines "shall this bill allow noncitizens to vote and make elections less secure?"

Expand full comment
Guy's avatar

The redistricting one was polarized on partisan lines. It doesn’t seem like it got a lot of Democratic votes against it.

Expand full comment
MPC's avatar

I remember reading a story from an Ohio Republican voter who voted "no" on it because it was deliberately confusing (he wanted to end the gerrymandering) -- just enough to throw off indies and moderate Rs who are tired of Matt Huffman running the state into the ground.

Expand full comment
John Carr's avatar

And yet under the current system Republicans still tried to gerrymander OH-01 and do devious things in the state legislature (which they did in the last few redistrictings) like connecting the city of Dayton to blood red rurals in totally different counties rather than the immediate suburbs in the same county to keep Dems from having a state senate and second state house seat there.

Expand full comment
ErrorError