Yep, and it was deliberately confusing enough that the "no" vote won. Had LaRose been forced to do an accurate summary, it would've gotten to a bare majority "yes".
LaRose and Yost are probably going to write something as misleading for the OH Voter Bill of Rights, probably something along the lines "shall this bill allow noncitizens to vote and make elections less secure?"
Yep, and it was deliberately confusing enough that the "no" vote won. Had LaRose been forced to do an accurate summary, it would've gotten to a bare majority "yes".
LaRose and Yost are probably going to write something as misleading for the OH Voter Bill of Rights, probably something along the lines "shall this bill allow noncitizens to vote and make elections less secure?"
I remember reading a story from an Ohio Republican voter who voted "no" on it because it was deliberately confusing (he wanted to end the gerrymandering) -- just enough to throw off indies and moderate Rs who are tired of Matt Huffman running the state into the ground.
Yep, and it was deliberately confusing enough that the "no" vote won. Had LaRose been forced to do an accurate summary, it would've gotten to a bare majority "yes".
LaRose and Yost are probably going to write something as misleading for the OH Voter Bill of Rights, probably something along the lines "shall this bill allow noncitizens to vote and make elections less secure?"
The redistricting one was polarized on partisan lines. It doesn’t seem like it got a lot of Democratic votes against it.
I remember reading a story from an Ohio Republican voter who voted "no" on it because it was deliberately confusing (he wanted to end the gerrymandering) -- just enough to throw off indies and moderate Rs who are tired of Matt Huffman running the state into the ground.