19 Comments
User's avatar
⭠ Return to thread
ArcticStones's avatar

Please, no! Far better if she and Rahm Emmanuel just quietly disappear.

Expand full comment
Ethan (KingofSpades)'s avatar

He at least would do the work. She would be tweaked out on psychedelics at committee meetings and babble incoherently.

Expand full comment
ArcticStones's avatar

Yes, Rahm Emmanuel would surely do work – but I am doubtful he would do the work that is needed at this moment in time. We need an honest discussion of how best to renew the party. The DNC Chair needs to lead that work; imho, it would be a mistake if the main focus of the Chair continues to be fundraising.

In my opinion, the Democratic Party needs to develop a serious 50-State Strategy, which means rebuilding many state-level organizations. The way to do that is to invite to the table the many groups that invested heavily and worked hard to win this election.

I am convinced that Ben Wikler is the best person for that job!

Expand full comment
Mike in MD's avatar

Rahm's served well, but I think he's a bit too much rooted in the past to be what the party needs now. It should be someone less shopworn--but not TOO new or inexperienced, and not too closely associated with any particular past or potential future candidate or faction of the party.

Ben Wikler and Ken Martin both fit the description well; so probably does Martin O'Malley though his electoral run was some time ago. There are several dark horses either running or considering doing so that may have potential (Marianne WIlliamson is of course not a serious candidate for anything.)

Expand full comment
Zero Cool's avatar

All I can say is that when Emanuel started becoming a dick as DCCC Chair to Howard Dean who had a great 50-state strategy vision as DNC Chair, that’s when it was over for me.

Also, Emanuel was possessed the wrong tone as Mayor of Chicago and behaved arrogantly towards teachers unions. He’s likely going to get serious pushback from such unions if he runs for DNC Chair.

Expand full comment
michaelflutist's avatar

Didn't he support police brutality and/or stop & frisk, too?

Expand full comment
Zero Cool's avatar

Stop and Frisk may have happened under Emanuel’s watch as Mayor.

However, he fought against Trump when he argued stop and frisk should be returned.

https://www.chicagotribune.com/2018/10/09/mayor-rahm-emanuel-rejects-president-donald-trumps-call-for-chicago-police-to-use-stop-and-frisk-tactics/

Expand full comment
michaelflutist's avatar

OK, quite late, though.

Expand full comment
Zero Cool's avatar

Politically, Emanuel had no choice. However, it shows that he was never an ideal Mayor.

Expand full comment
Henrik's avatar

If this was 2014 not 2024 I’d be all for Rahm taking over but I think he’s been out of the game just a bit too long

Expand full comment
Zero Cool's avatar

Agreed! When most Democrats these days want a 50 state strategy, Emanuel will likely not be focused as much on this.

Expand full comment
YouHaveToVoteForOneOfUS's avatar

Behind the hippie New Age facade she’s actually a vicious person who routinely verbally abuses staffers and is prone to violent outbursts.

https://www.politico.com/news/2023/03/16/marianne-williamson-abusive-treatment-2020-campaign-staff-00087268

Expand full comment
Ethan (KingofSpades)'s avatar

Mars must have been in Cancer a lot then.

Expand full comment
Zero Cool's avatar

Oh man.

We certainly don’t want a DNC Chair like Marianne Williamson with this kind of attitude.

This story should definitely bury her chances.

Expand full comment
Ethan (KingofSpades)'s avatar

Pffft, hahaha! Did she consult "I Ching" or astrology texts to come to this decision?

Expand full comment
Zero Cool's avatar

Dear god.

Hasn’t Williamson ever learned that Democratic primary voters not once but twice overwhelming did NOT vote for her?

I guess she hasn’t!

Expand full comment