You definitely implied it would be a coronation without Simon running, which he is not. Presumably you meant Flanagan was being coronated, even though Craig and Franzen are also running? Then you said your "point still stands," which I took to mean you still think your point about MN is valid. Maybe your "point still stands" was about coronations in general, because I don't see a point still standing about MN.
I didn't say there was a coronation, i said it's good there's no coronation. Who are you arguing with?
You definitely implied it would be a coronation without Simon running, which he is not. Presumably you meant Flanagan was being coronated, even though Craig and Franzen are also running? Then you said your "point still stands," which I took to mean you still think your point about MN is valid. Maybe your "point still stands" was about coronations in general, because I don't see a point still standing about MN.