Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Henrik's avatar

Seattle Mayor: to nobody’s surprise, Bruce Harrell has announced he’s running for re-election. If he wins - and as of today I’d say that modestly likely - he’ll be the first mayor to be re-elected since Greg Nickels in 2005. (Nickels was defeated in 2009 by McGinn, who was defeated by Murray in 2013. Who then it turned out had credible pedophilia allegations against him, and then Durkan was syphilis-level popular by 2021 and didn’t even bother running again).

Harrell imo has been pretty mediocre, like every mayor since Norm Rice retired 28 years ago. He’s unambitious on housing, though better on that front than the now-NIMBY City Council. But the key issue for the city the last 3-4 years has been public safety and QOL issues like other big West Coast cities and there one can see a major improvement, though there’s still a ways to go and 3rd Avenue remains a mess.

It’ll be interesting to see who the progressive faction digs up against him; it’s unlikely anybody credibly runs to his right and makes a runoff with him, but the “Stranger” types got absolutely bodied two cycles in a row after their triumphs of 2015-19. The pendulum will swing back their way eventually, but the COVID-era damage to their policy program will take a while to recover from

Expand full comment
Kildere53's avatar

So somebody imported a dataset into DRA of the precinct-level election results from this year's election in New York City. And I've been looking through that.

Frankly, it's really kind of appalling how terribly Harris did in NYC. Neighborhoods like Dyker Heights and Bensonhurst are almost uniformly 60%+ for Trump. The entire Flushing area of Queens is now purple, if not red in some areas. Ozone Park, Woodhaven, and Richmond Hill are now less than 60% Democratic. Precincts in Corona that are heavily Hispanic and gave Biden 70% now voted for Trump. And the South Bronx, once home to the bluest congressional district in the entire country, is now only 70% Democratic. In some precincts, Harris got less than half of the votes that Biden did. (And Hillary generally did even better than Biden in those precincts.) What happened?!?!?

Another thing I noticed is that Harris got only about 92-93% in the heavily African-American precincts. She clearly didn't receive any sort of bump in support from them due to her own African-American heritage. And yet Obama generally got >99% of the vote in those same precincts. Did African-Americans not consider Harris's candidacy historic since she wasn't the first Black presidential nominee? Or, I can't help but wonder if the reason why Obama won almost unanimous support from African-Americans wasn't just because he was Black (as many people claimed after the 2008 election), and that the economic crash just before the 2008 election that happened on Republicans' watch (a factor that Harris didn't have) was also a major factor (meaning that Obama might have only got 96% or so of the African-American vote if the economy had been doing fine).

Expand full comment
27 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?