Playing to win implies pulling out all the stops, while playing for a close second accepts defeat as a given.
Some of this district was won in a special in 2009 by Bill Owens, who held it until 2014. Special elections are quirky things, so we don't know who will show up and how the tariffs will hit upstate NY.
No one suggested anywhere at anytime about playing for a close second; I am tired of your nonsense; you do it in every post you make; you create a rebuttal argument against something that was never posted by the original poster
What would be the difference between playing to win and playing for a close second place?
The worst Stefanik ever did was in Trump's midterm, when she only won by about 14 points.
Playing to win implies pulling out all the stops, while playing for a close second accepts defeat as a given.
Some of this district was won in a special in 2009 by Bill Owens, who held it until 2014. Special elections are quirky things, so we don't know who will show up and how the tariffs will hit upstate NY.
No one suggested anywhere at anytime about playing for a close second; I am tired of your nonsense; you do it in every post you make; you create a rebuttal argument against something that was never posted by the original poster