8 Comments
User's avatar
тна Return to thread
Ben Piggot's avatar

think that is too strong. They still are a very good pollster, especially with how transparently Nate Cohn discusses what is going on and what they are trying to do.

That said, they have had a number of important misses in the past, so we absolutely shouldn't take their polls as gospel. But they themselves would say that I think.

Expand full comment
michaelflutist's avatar

They can be a good pollster, and their polls this year could still be a joke. Only the election results will show whether they were close to being on target or wildly off.

Expand full comment
sacman701's avatar

Also Texas hasn't elected a Democrat statewide in 30 years. There's much less of an incentive to poll it accurately than you would have with a more competitive state.

Expand full comment
michaelflutist's avatar

Or a more obviously competitive one.

Expand full comment
ArcticStones's avatar

Hard to credibly claim that AllredтАУCruz isnтАЩt obviously competitive.

Expand full comment
michaelflutist's avatar

Agreed. But thinking the presidential race is competitive there is a bridge too far for many people. I think it could be and wouldn't rate the state more than Likely-R for the presidential race.

Expand full comment
sacman701's avatar

The presidential race might be competitive-ish, but with Harris' best poll all cycle showing her down 3 there isn't a reason to think it's seriously in play.

Expand full comment
michaelflutist's avatar

I don't disagree, but if all hell really breaks loose, Florida and Texas would be the next states after North Carolina to flip.

Expand full comment
ErrorError