9 Comments
User's avatar
⭠ Return to thread
Jonathan's avatar

It's definitely a start and bodes well for the out party

Expand full comment
Henrik's avatar

I think Mark’s caution in the digest last night (it’s his home state after all) is warranted but there’s no way to read it as *bad* news, by any means

Expand full comment
Jonathan's avatar

you are definitely allowed to use the word caution (it's your opinion after all) and I get that, but imo extreme caution sometimes borders on the ridiculous; taking that type district is a huge win(to make it even competitive is a huge indicator of the Trump second term environment and the chaos that's already a daily occurrence); someone here posted that Trump is already like -10 in approval rating and it's still JANUARY

Expand full comment
Henrik's avatar

Oh, sure. There’s no way to interpret it as bad news!

Expand full comment
JanusIanitos's avatar

Caution is the right way to go about it. That said, I do have more optimism for special election overperformance portending a good midterm than I do for it portending a good presidential election. Not that it's definitive either way.

Expand full comment
Jonathan's avatar

I think the important part is that we are now the out party

Expand full comment
Andrew's avatar

Agreed. In my head, this shows that damn near every Dem showed up to vote while the GOP had typical voter drop-off in a special, giving us a tiny win. The drop-off will be much less in a midterm but if Dems are operating at Pres year strength and the GOP is operating at midterm year strength, the GOP loses big time.

Expand full comment
Jonathan's avatar

Exactly

Expand full comment
Henrik's avatar

Same - seems like it’s a better correlation

Expand full comment
ErrorError