Yeah, the one article I read mentioned there was a citation but in the footnotes or something. Girl, bye. But it was stupid bc it took a few paragraphs to say that as if to try to cause a controversy. What the article should’ve said is, Harris and her co-author don’t know AMLA format or something.
Incidents like the townhall may pass the media as "Trump being Trump" but I think there is a substantial part of the under-70 electorate that is reminded of their incompetent racist uncle/grandfather who blames everyone else in the family for everything that can be the decisive factor in this election that is repulsed by stuff like this.
The “plagiarism” accusation isn’t on the main page website of any news organization. Total nothing burger.
There apparently were a few places in her 2009 book where she cited sources but didn’t format quotes correctly. I doubt anyone will care.
Yeah, this sounds like something to simply correct in any new edition, and obviously unintentional.
Yeah, the one article I read mentioned there was a citation but in the footnotes or something. Girl, bye. But it was stupid bc it took a few paragraphs to say that as if to try to cause a controversy. What the article should’ve said is, Harris and her co-author don’t know AMLA format or something.
Nah, the other quotes were cited properly. It was just an oversight. Mistakes happen.
Incidents like the townhall may pass the media as "Trump being Trump" but I think there is a substantial part of the under-70 electorate that is reminded of their incompetent racist uncle/grandfather who blames everyone else in the family for everything that can be the decisive factor in this election that is repulsed by stuff like this.