Yeah, the one article I read mentioned there was a citation but in the footnotes or something. Girl, bye. But it was stupid bc it took a few paragraphs to say that as if to try to cause a controversy. What the article should’ve said is, Harris and her co-author don’t know AMLA format or something.
The “plagiarism” accusation isn’t on the main page website of any news organization. Total nothing burger.
There apparently were a few places in her 2009 book where she cited sources but didn’t format quotes correctly. I doubt anyone will care.
Yeah, this sounds like something to simply correct in any new edition, and obviously unintentional.
Yeah, the one article I read mentioned there was a citation but in the footnotes or something. Girl, bye. But it was stupid bc it took a few paragraphs to say that as if to try to cause a controversy. What the article should’ve said is, Harris and her co-author don’t know AMLA format or something.
Nah, the other quotes were cited properly. It was just an oversight. Mistakes happen.