7 Comments
User's avatar
тна Return to thread
Mark's avatar

They've given a crap about the narrative and banking early votes in the past but decided to take this year off?

Expand full comment
GoHabsGo's avatar

I don't know why people are so dismissive of your concern here. It's definitely possible that Harris still wins Nevada, it's not looking looking apocalyptic for Dems or anything, but it's definitely worrisome.

What keeps me a little optimistic for Nevada is that both parties cut spending for the House races, but still the EV vote doesn't look great.

Expand full comment
Mark's avatar

The ad spending cuts for Lee and Horsford are especially baffling with this backdrop. Somebody must know something that those of us can't see from afar.

Expand full comment
michaelflutist's avatar

It sure seems so.

Expand full comment
Steven Gould Axelrod's avatar

Maybe the late ballot delivery in Clark (if that happened) is still having ramifications in the tea leaves we're reading?

Expand full comment
Jonathan's avatar

In politics, ALWAYS follow the money(if the Nevada collapse were a real thing, then the Republicans would not be the one doing the triage); in the Reid Machine, I Trust

Expand full comment
michaelflutist's avatar

The money is usually right or turns into a self-fulfilling prophecy, but there are exceptions.

Expand full comment
ErrorError