I love the LA Times and feel happier when reading it than when reading the NYT or WaPo. Fewer things to annoy me, less sense of self-importance, more sense that life's worth living. That said, I'm disturbed by the failure of the LAT to endorse Harris. This is the kind of existential election in which everyone, and of course every newspap…
I love the LA Times and feel happier when reading it than when reading the NYT or WaPo. Fewer things to annoy me, less sense of self-importance, more sense that life's worth living. That said, I'm disturbed by the failure of the LAT to endorse Harris. This is the kind of existential election in which everyone, and of course every newspaper, should make clear where they stand. The failure here is not the fault of the editorial writers, who apparently had an endorsement ready to go, but of the paper's billionaire owner Patrick Soon-Shiong. I don't what what his problem is, since he's said nothing. The failure to endorse is a great disappointment and a historic mistake.
I love the LA Times and feel happier when reading it than when reading the NYT or WaPo. Fewer things to annoy me, less sense of self-importance, more sense that life's worth living. That said, I'm disturbed by the failure of the LAT to endorse Harris. This is the kind of existential election in which everyone, and of course every newspaper, should make clear where they stand. The failure here is not the fault of the editorial writers, who apparently had an endorsement ready to go, but of the paper's billionaire owner Patrick Soon-Shiong. I don't what what his problem is, since he's said nothing. The failure to endorse is a great disappointment and a historic mistake.