The legislature is notoriously opaque. Even things like votes on legislation aren't public record. Even if the case to vote 'no' were more convincing, that alone would convince me to vote 'yes'.
The legislature is notoriously opaque. Even things like votes on legislation aren't public record. Even if the case to vote 'no' were more convincing, that alone would convince me to vote 'yes'.
"In recent years, the number of international students at U.S. colleges and universities has declined. Do you believe the U.S. should do more to attract foreign students to our colleges and universities?"
The results deviated sharply on racial lines :
White 23-55
Asian 64-19
Black 50-36
Hispanic 42-42
The overall result was essentially the same for all education levels.
Glad to see it isn't even remotely close. I already expected it to pass but I do worry that voters could get confused (I'm lazy and haven't looked up the ballot wording) and vote no as a result.
I suspect the actual result will be a little closer, since the wording the Pioneer Institute used is different than what's on the ballot, but it should still win in a landslide.
Ballot Question:
This proposed law would specify that the State Auditor has the authority to audit the Legislature.
A YES VOTE would specify that the State Auditor has the authority to audit the Legislature.
A NO VOTE would make no change in the law relative to the State Auditor’s authority.
(Remarkably clear and concise, which is unusual for MA questions)
PI poll question:
The job of the State Auditor is to audit state agencies, report on how well they are functioning and make recommendations for improvement. In Massachusetts, the legislature is exempt from these audits. The current State Auditor is seeking to gain the ability to audit the legislature. Do you approve of this?
(Seems to be pushing for a 'yes' answer in my view)
An Emerson College poll (for the right-wing Pioneer Institute) found Question 1 up 80-6:
https://pioneerinstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/ECP-Pioneer-Institute-Report-Aug.-2024.pdf
The legislature is notoriously opaque. Even things like votes on legislation aren't public record. Even if the case to vote 'no' were more convincing, that alone would convince me to vote 'yes'.
An interesting tidbit from the same Emerson poll:
"In recent years, the number of international students at U.S. colleges and universities has declined. Do you believe the U.S. should do more to attract foreign students to our colleges and universities?"
The results deviated sharply on racial lines :
White 23-55
Asian 64-19
Black 50-36
Hispanic 42-42
The overall result was essentially the same for all education levels.
Unsurprisingly, whites are the most racist and xenophobic.
Glad to see it isn't even remotely close. I already expected it to pass but I do worry that voters could get confused (I'm lazy and haven't looked up the ballot wording) and vote no as a result.
I suspect the actual result will be a little closer, since the wording the Pioneer Institute used is different than what's on the ballot, but it should still win in a landslide.
Ballot Question:
This proposed law would specify that the State Auditor has the authority to audit the Legislature.
A YES VOTE would specify that the State Auditor has the authority to audit the Legislature.
A NO VOTE would make no change in the law relative to the State Auditor’s authority.
(Remarkably clear and concise, which is unusual for MA questions)
PI poll question:
The job of the State Auditor is to audit state agencies, report on how well they are functioning and make recommendations for improvement. In Massachusetts, the legislature is exempt from these audits. The current State Auditor is seeking to gain the ability to audit the legislature. Do you approve of this?
(Seems to be pushing for a 'yes' answer in my view)
Yeah, that's easy to understand, for a ballot measure.