CA-41 is moving away from Ken Calvert as the demographics in the district do not favor him. He's facing a similar situation as what Darrell Issa had faced heading towards the 2016 election back in CA-49 then.
The chaos with the Temecula Unified school board is bound to be setting a tone going up the ballot of it. Upsetting high propensity, highly educated voters is bad dharma.
Basically, same goes me on left-shifting/suburban R-held seats in general. If we manage to beat Fitzpatrick, for example, the R's would probably nominate some frothing-at-the-mouth fascist on future cycles and we'd just hold the seat.
At the congressional level, CA-27 and CA-41. If Dems flip both, I think they’ll be held by Dems for quite some time.
CA-41 is moving away from Ken Calvert as the demographics in the district do not favor him. He's facing a similar situation as what Darrell Issa had faced heading towards the 2016 election back in CA-49 then.
The chaos with the Temecula Unified school board is bound to be setting a tone going up the ballot of it. Upsetting high propensity, highly educated voters is bad dharma.
Basically, same goes me on left-shifting/suburban R-held seats in general. If we manage to beat Fitzpatrick, for example, the R's would probably nominate some frothing-at-the-mouth fascist on future cycles and we'd just hold the seat.
The recent PPIC poll showed Dems up 14 in the *swing* seats in CA. If true we’re picking up Rollins, Whitesides, and a handful of others.
Plausible