That’s fair enough! For me, it’s a great way to show how extreme and out of touch Republicans are with average Americans so I’m going to continue promoting it even if I don’t agree with it. It’s pretty much the big issue I disagree with her on and it’s one where the Democratic base is out of touch with what the majority want, which is im…
That’s fair enough! For me, it’s a great way to show how extreme and out of touch Republicans are with average Americans so I’m going to continue promoting it even if I don’t agree with it. It’s pretty much the big issue I disagree with her on and it’s one where the Democratic base is out of touch with what the majority want, which is important to those few swing voters who hate both parties and always decide every election winner.
Joe Biden in 2020 had the different from Democrats, “old white guy moderate” to entice these voters esthetically to help win their votes in the middle or centre-right. Yes, people hated Trump, but against other Democrats who ran in the primary to the left? Maybe they don’t vote for them, stay home, write-in/3rd party or vote for Trump and he’s still president right now.
Kamala doesn’t have that esthetic to win crossover votes, so she needed 1 issue to break from the party base and moved her party closer to where the country is, to signal her independence as a “different Democrat” to try to win those crucial voters again. They were closed off to Biden due to feeling he wasn’t up to being president another 4 years, but now they’re open to hearing her pitch.
Also, I think we’re closer on policy then we think because verified claims of refugees should be and is accepted by Harris as the right thing to do. But it’s the lead up to those claims being proven where the disagreement comes from on the process. We agree on the end result though.
That’s fair enough! For me, it’s a great way to show how extreme and out of touch Republicans are with average Americans so I’m going to continue promoting it even if I don’t agree with it. It’s pretty much the big issue I disagree with her on and it’s one where the Democratic base is out of touch with what the majority want, which is important to those few swing voters who hate both parties and always decide every election winner.
Joe Biden in 2020 had the different from Democrats, “old white guy moderate” to entice these voters esthetically to help win their votes in the middle or centre-right. Yes, people hated Trump, but against other Democrats who ran in the primary to the left? Maybe they don’t vote for them, stay home, write-in/3rd party or vote for Trump and he’s still president right now.
Kamala doesn’t have that esthetic to win crossover votes, so she needed 1 issue to break from the party base and moved her party closer to where the country is, to signal her independence as a “different Democrat” to try to win those crucial voters again. They were closed off to Biden due to feeling he wasn’t up to being president another 4 years, but now they’re open to hearing her pitch.
Also, I think we’re closer on policy then we think because verified claims of refugees should be and is accepted by Harris as the right thing to do. But it’s the lead up to those claims being proven where the disagreement comes from on the process. We agree on the end result though.
Yeah, if your asylum case isn't heard because they don't like where you ran to, it doesn't matter if Harris would theoretically consider it valid.