10 Comments
User's avatar
тна Return to thread
Miguel Parreno's avatar

I've made a spreadsheet of Democratic Incumbents over 55 with vote shares over 60% in their district and plan to track their responses to all of Trump's shenanigans and if they're not vocal enough about it. I think it's fair to say that a primary would be in order.

Expand full comment
Paleo's avatar

Why the age restriction?

Expand full comment
Miguel Parreno's avatar

Not necessarily an age restriction. We hear all the time about how old the party is and I was just curious to see it broken down into just how old it was and I found it to be quite interesting. 113 Reps are over 55. 55 are over 70 and 11 are 80 or older. Now that doesn't mean that everyone is treated the same but I think it would send a huge message if they either stepped down willingly or were taken down via a primary.

Expand full comment
michaelflutist's avatar

55 is not old at all. I support primarying out overly right-wing or timid Democrats when that is likely to result in moving the seats in question further left, rather than losing them to Republicans, but trying to purge the party based on age starting at 55 would be ludicrous and stupid, in my opinion.

Expand full comment
Miguel Parreno's avatar

I didn't say it was. That's just the cutoff that I decided on and there are bigger fish to fry than those that are 55. I'm also looking at what their primary vote share was, what their district vote share was, where they fall ideologically, and how long they've been in office. Anyone from the 1900s in a 60+% district I think should be primaried at the very least. For example Doris Matsui and her husband have represented a California congressional district going back to 1979. She's 80 years old and her district voted for her with over 66% of the vote. I think she's someone who should be primaried if she doesn't retire.

Expand full comment
michaelflutist's avatar

Anyone from the 1900s. That means people over 25. Hahahahahah

Expand full comment
sacman701's avatar

Democrats have a problem with younger voters and noncollege younger voters in particular, but the solution isn't to descend into blatant ageism.

Expand full comment
Andrew's avatar

And do what with that info? Be angry over it? What does that do to help defeat Republicans?

Expand full comment
Miguel Parreno's avatar

I plan on moving onto the House Republicans next. This has basically come about because I'm working on helping my college friend run for a House seat in Wisconsin. We've heard all the time about how institutional knowledge was so important and how we couldn't afford to lose any of these leaders but that old world is gone. We don't need Reps who are going to play nice. We need fighters who are ready for the challenge ahead of us and willing to do what's necessary to fight back against this actual coup by an unelected bureaucrat.

Expand full comment
Paleo's avatar

In solid Democratic seats?

Expand full comment