I don't disagree, and if you could build up the Ds in Charleston then it would be harder gerrymander to the present 6-1 split we have now. But we had a lawsuit like the Alabama one about gerrymandering specifically on racial packing Clyburn's district that went no where. CD01 is Nancy Mace and he…
I don't disagree, and if you could build up the Ds in Charleston then it would be harder gerrymander to the present 6-1 split we have now. But we had a lawsuit like the Alabama one about gerrymandering specifically on racial packing Clyburn's district that went no where. CD01 is Nancy Mace and her district was made redder after she beat Joe Cunningham. Plus the state level is badly titled too.
I just think there are better places to spend money than SC.
Agreed on investment being better spent in other states. I'd only selectively focus on SC for the exact reasons I mentioned but yes, definitely want to aim where the traction is the most.
AZ, GA and TX represent room for growth for Democrats as do AK and KS.
Should have been cannot fix by initiative.
I don't disagree, and if you could build up the Ds in Charleston then it would be harder gerrymander to the present 6-1 split we have now. But we had a lawsuit like the Alabama one about gerrymandering specifically on racial packing Clyburn's district that went no where. CD01 is Nancy Mace and her district was made redder after she beat Joe Cunningham. Plus the state level is badly titled too.
I just think there are better places to spend money than SC.
Agreed on investment being better spent in other states. I'd only selectively focus on SC for the exact reasons I mentioned but yes, definitely want to aim where the traction is the most.
AZ, GA and TX represent room for growth for Democrats as do AK and KS.