I'm not trying to make the point that Warren (or Bernie) would have done better than Harris. (Especially since she did significantly worse overall.) I think the data is intrinsically interesting, which is why I shared it. If your interpretation of that data is that it's all about Trump, that's a possible explanation. Personally I think t…
I'm not trying to make the point that Warren (or Bernie) would have done better than Harris. (Especially since she did significantly worse overall.) I think the data is intrinsically interesting, which is why I shared it. If your interpretation of that data is that it's all about Trump, that's a possible explanation. Personally I think the D candidate did make a difference and to claim that it wouldn't have moved a single vote disregards what voters said both in polling and in focus group settings. That being said, Trump does have a tendency to suck up all the oxygen in the room, so voters' feelings about Harris, or another hypothetical nominee, had less weight than what they thought of Trump, but it still had an impact on their decision.
I'm not trying to make the point that Warren (or Bernie) would have done better than Harris. (Especially since she did significantly worse overall.) I think the data is intrinsically interesting, which is why I shared it. If your interpretation of that data is that it's all about Trump, that's a possible explanation. Personally I think the D candidate did make a difference and to claim that it wouldn't have moved a single vote disregards what voters said both in polling and in focus group settings. That being said, Trump does have a tendency to suck up all the oxygen in the room, so voters' feelings about Harris, or another hypothetical nominee, had less weight than what they thought of Trump, but it still had an impact on their decision.