Don't fall into the Mitt Romney "unskewing" trap. Not liking a data point doesn't mean we ignore the data point, especially from a valid source (which NYT/Siena unequivocally is).
Don't fall into the Mitt Romney "unskewing" trap. Not liking a data point doesn't mean we ignore the data point, especially from a valid source (which NYT/Siena unequivocally is).
Always the pile.
Don't fall into the Mitt Romney "unskewing" trap. Not liking a data point doesn't mean we ignore the data point, especially from a valid source (which NYT/Siena unequivocally is).