Yeah I'm not rooting for murderers to run amuck I just want some clarification on how uniform the standard of "proof is evident or presumption is great" so it's not used as a constitutionally protected presumption of guilt or catch-all for anyone facing the charges.
Yeah I'm not rooting for murderers to run amuck I just want some clarification on how uniform the standard of "proof is evident or presumption is great" so it's not used as a constitutionally protected presumption of guilt or catch-all for anyone facing the charges.
Yeah I'm not rooting for murderers to run amuck I just want some clarification on how uniform the standard of "proof is evident or presumption is great" so it's not used as a constitutionally protected presumption of guilt or catch-all for anyone facing the charges.