20 Comments
User's avatar
⭠ Return to thread
LiberalBuffalo's avatar

Virginia Gov

Spanberger 39%

Sears 24%

Trump Approval

59% Disapprove

37% Approve

Roanoke #C - 690 RV - 2/20

New York Gov

Hochul (inc): 46%

Lawler: 38%

Other: 10%

---

Undecided: 6%

——

NY Governor Dem Primary

Hochul: 52%

Delgado: 15%

Torres: 12%

——

Citizen Data for Unite NY | RVs | Feb. 10

Massachusetts Senate

Markey 35%

Baker 33%

YouGov #B - 700 A - 2/20

Expand full comment
LiberalBuffalo's avatar

Ohio Gov

Acton 45%

Rammaswamy 44%

V. Ramaswamy: 48%

Tim Ryan: 42%

Public policy #B - 642 RV - 2/20 (Fpr Action)

Expand full comment
Henrik's avatar

The Action v Ryan numbers are actually somewhat surprising to me

Expand full comment
LiberalBuffalo's avatar

Not sure what questions they asked but it was polled for Actions campaign.

Expand full comment
Henrik's avatar

Ahhhhh

Expand full comment
Mike in MD's avatar

Acton's? Amy Action sounds like the name of a superhero--though any Dem who wins a major statewide race in Ohio nowadays should probably qualify as that.

Expand full comment
David Nir's avatar

The poll was for 314 Action, which hasn't endorsed her (yet) but did say kind things about her when she launched.

Expand full comment
Toiler On the Sea's avatar

Oh JHC that Vivek-Ryan number os so depressing. How did Ohio turn into Missouri . . .

Expand full comment
michaelflutist's avatar

How did Missouri turn into Missouri?

Expand full comment
LiberalBuffalo's avatar

Massachusetts Gov

Healey (D): 44% - Shortsleeve (R): 12%

Healey (D): 44% - Evangelidis (R): 14%

Healey (D): 41% - Durant (R): 14%

Healey (D): 40% - Kennealy (R): 15%

Healey (D): 45% - Deaton (R): 25%

U. Mass/YouGov / Feb 20, 2025 / n=700

Expand full comment
Kevin H.'s avatar

Baker ain't leaving the presidency of the NCAA to be a senator.

Expand full comment
JanusIanitos's avatar

Baker wouldn't be able to win anyway.

We go through this song and dance every other cycle or so, an off-partisan governor gets hyped up as a senatorial candidate because they were popular. But a big part of why they were popular is that they were unable to push any of their party's agenda.

Barring a political disaster, Baker cannot win a senate race in Massachusetts. It's all hype with no substance, but people are going to talk about the possibility of it until at least the end of the 2030 cycle and probably through the 2032 cycle. Likewise, we're almost certainly not going to see a senator Beshear out of Kentucky.

Voters do not treat federal partisanship and local partisanship the same. They do not treat executive offices and legislative offices the same.

Expand full comment
Jonathan's avatar

probably but Trump is losing popularity daily

Expand full comment
Jonathan's avatar

He'd lose anyway

Expand full comment
Jonathan's avatar

lots of pissed off Federal government employees

Expand full comment
Zero Cool's avatar

Yup! I would not want to be in Earle-Sears' shoes at this point.

Expand full comment
Henrik's avatar

Apparently the GOP is trying to find somebody to run in the primary (Dave LaRock has mooted it) because her campaign so far sucks

Expand full comment
Zero Cool's avatar

Earle-Sears isn’t anything other than a Trump stooge and she’s not even showing any kind of real independence on this.

Expand full comment
Zero Cool's avatar

The VA-GOV race looks like Likely Democrat this point with the numbers as wide as they are here.

Expand full comment
Paleo's avatar

Like those job approval numbers

Expand full comment