You bet. Being mildly anti-Trump, or even vociferously anti-Trump, does not make folks like Liz Cheney or Toomey anti-fascist, they just prefer different fascists than Trump to be in charge.
You bet. Being mildly anti-Trump, or even vociferously anti-Trump, does not make folks like Liz Cheney or Toomey anti-fascist, they just prefer different fascists than Trump to be in charge.
I agree. During a time when there are supporters of actual dictatorship, politicians who are somewhat anti-democratic but refuse to support Trump are not that.
Or unless the American people refuse to be conned anymore. But keep in mind, a lot of the support for the Republican Party is motivated by racism and not being conned. It's obvious, when you remember that a majority of white voters have voted Republican since the 1968 election. What happened between 1964 and 1968? Right.
Good points although Reaganism and Reaganomics were really conning the public. The notion that trickled down economics ever truly gave anyone prosperity besides the wealthy and super wealthy is the real con.
For the racism part, yes, thatтАЩs unfortunately a big albatross on the GOP and itтАЩs ability to expand its base.
You bet. Being mildly anti-Trump, or even vociferously anti-Trump, does not make folks like Liz Cheney or Toomey anti-fascist, they just prefer different fascists than Trump to be in charge.
Fascist seems a little harsh
I agree. During a time when there are supporters of actual dictatorship, politicians who are somewhat anti-democratic but refuse to support Trump are not that.
Once we get over this, then the conversation remains about the GOP:
Unless the party becomes more moderate, they will still con the public like they have done since the Reagan years.
Or unless the American people refuse to be conned anymore. But keep in mind, a lot of the support for the Republican Party is motivated by racism and not being conned. It's obvious, when you remember that a majority of white voters have voted Republican since the 1968 election. What happened between 1964 and 1968? Right.
Good points although Reaganism and Reaganomics were really conning the public. The notion that trickled down economics ever truly gave anyone prosperity besides the wealthy and super wealthy is the real con.
For the racism part, yes, thatтАЩs unfortunately a big albatross on the GOP and itтАЩs ability to expand its base.
It may be an albatross on their necks now, but it's what made them win often for decades.