11 Comments
User's avatar
⭠ Return to thread
DiesIrae's avatar

That's a very good Wisconsin pollster.

And they're finding Baldwin up 52-47 H2H and 51-45 multi candidate as well, just a point or so better than Harris. RV numbers 52-48 for Harris as well.

Expand full comment
Paleo's avatar

Actually it’s 53-46 in both. Think you’re looking at the poll from three weeks ago.

Expand full comment
DiesIrae's avatar

Wow. Apparently I can't read. Thanks for the catch!

Expand full comment
Mark's avatar

Surprised at the convergence of Baldwin and Harris in so many polls. I figured Baldwin would run at least 3 points ahead of the top of the ticket.

Expand full comment
Paleo's avatar

Well, she actually is in terms of the spread. 53-46 compared to 52-48

Expand full comment
Jonathan's avatar

I might add it's really nice to see BOTH over 50%

Expand full comment
James Trout's avatar

Considering Wisconsin being close in Presidential Elections is nothing new - people forget that both Gore and Kerry won the Badger State by less than one half per cent in their races - a four to seven per cent margin there is looking pretty good.

Expand full comment
Jonathan's avatar

The 3BigTen states (Wisconsin, Michigan, Pennsylvania) have voted the same in every presidential since 1988; I expect this year to be the same(and yes, they will all be relatively close)

Expand full comment
James Trout's avatar

Nope. Wisconsin voted for Dukakis. Bush the Elder won Michigan and Pennsylvania. Interestingly Dukakis did better in Pittsburgh than he did in Philadelphia.

Expand full comment
Jonathan's avatar

I said since1988 meaning I was not including it; perhaps bad wording but not going to quibble; my point is about this year(I knew the 1988 results; interesting to me was Connecticut, California, actually a lot of Western states)

Expand full comment
michaelflutist's avatar

That would mean since 1992. Since always includes the starting point.

Expand full comment
ErrorError