And they're finding Baldwin up 52-47 H2H and 51-45 multi candidate as well, just a point or so better than Harris. RV numbers 52-48 for Harris as well.
And they're finding Baldwin up 52-47 H2H and 51-45 multi candidate as well, just a point or so better than Harris. RV numbers 52-48 for Harris as well.
Considering Wisconsin being close in Presidential Elections is nothing new - people forget that both Gore and Kerry won the Badger State by less than one half per cent in their races - a four to seven per cent margin there is looking pretty good.
The 3BigTen states (Wisconsin, Michigan, Pennsylvania) have voted the same in every presidential since 1988; I expect this year to be the same(and yes, they will all be relatively close)
Nope. Wisconsin voted for Dukakis. Bush the Elder won Michigan and Pennsylvania. Interestingly Dukakis did better in Pittsburgh than he did in Philadelphia.
I said since1988 meaning I was not including it; perhaps bad wording but not going to quibble; my point is about this year(I knew the 1988 results; interesting to me was Connecticut, California, actually a lot of Western states)
That's a very good Wisconsin pollster.
And they're finding Baldwin up 52-47 H2H and 51-45 multi candidate as well, just a point or so better than Harris. RV numbers 52-48 for Harris as well.
Actually it’s 53-46 in both. Think you’re looking at the poll from three weeks ago.
Wow. Apparently I can't read. Thanks for the catch!
Surprised at the convergence of Baldwin and Harris in so many polls. I figured Baldwin would run at least 3 points ahead of the top of the ticket.
Well, she actually is in terms of the spread. 53-46 compared to 52-48
I might add it's really nice to see BOTH over 50%
Considering Wisconsin being close in Presidential Elections is nothing new - people forget that both Gore and Kerry won the Badger State by less than one half per cent in their races - a four to seven per cent margin there is looking pretty good.
The 3BigTen states (Wisconsin, Michigan, Pennsylvania) have voted the same in every presidential since 1988; I expect this year to be the same(and yes, they will all be relatively close)
Nope. Wisconsin voted for Dukakis. Bush the Elder won Michigan and Pennsylvania. Interestingly Dukakis did better in Pittsburgh than he did in Philadelphia.
I said since1988 meaning I was not including it; perhaps bad wording but not going to quibble; my point is about this year(I knew the 1988 results; interesting to me was Connecticut, California, actually a lot of Western states)
That would mean since 1992. Since always includes the starting point.