7 Comments
User's avatar
тна Return to thread
Paleo's avatar

ust released: national estimates from CES pre-election interviews with over 70k american adults

National LVs (Oct. 1 - 25):

Harris: 51%

Trump: 47%

Dynamic crosstabs: https://cooperativeelectionstudy.shinyapps.io/prez2024pre/

Release: https://sites.tufts.edu/cooperativeelectionstudy/2024/10/28/ces-estimates-on-the-2024-presidential-election/

https://x.com/b_schaffner/status/1850919058775941605

Expand full comment
ArcticStones's avatar

If polling averages were weighted by sample size, this poll alone would be enough to compensate for the flood of polls recently released from bad-faith R-leaning pollsters.

Expand full comment
Henrik's avatar

Are surveys of that size common?!

Expand full comment
Paleo's avatar

Not really. Post-election I've seen. Such as Pew Research.

Expand full comment
William's avatar

itтАЩs Yougov that did the survey and they have panels this large.

Expand full comment
JanusIanitos's avatar

That's a fascinatingly large polling size.

Mathematically we should not give that much extra weight to a 70k sample vs a 1k sample. But I wonder if having a sample size this large might help to counterbalance some of the fundamental issues polling faces today. Or, if instead it just magnifies those problems over the larger group.

Skimming the crosstabs I do not see anything truly egregious, but parts of it look decently off from what I'd expect too. The gender gap is small: men are Harris +1, women Harris +8. It has Trump with 22% of the black vote but only 51% of the white vote. Trump wins independents by 3 while losing nationally by 4.

I'll give them credit for doing something different, at the very minimum.

Expand full comment
ErrorError