I don't disagree with many of the names on the author's list, but I'd prefer that he back up his assertions with something stronger than flame-throwing, which was his main strategy. But maybe flame-throwing is fine if this was really only aimed at insiders eho know the details. If this is the general tone of The American Prospect, then I can add it to the list of sites to ignore.
I don't disagree with many of the names on the author's list, but I'd prefer that he back up his assertions with something stronger than flame-throwing, which was his main strategy. But maybe flame-throwing is fine if this was really only aimed at insiders eho know the details. If this is the general tone of The American Prospect, then I can add it to the list of sites to ignore.
I don't disagree with many of the names on the author's list, but I'd prefer that he back up his assertions with something stronger than flame-throwing, which was his main strategy. But maybe flame-throwing is fine if this was really only aimed at insiders eho know the details. If this is the general tone of The American Prospect, then I can add it to the list of sites to ignore.