3 Comments
User's avatar
⭠ Return to thread
Tigercourse's avatar

It's very difficult to believe that this would do much to actually make the subways better (billions upon billions are already spent and they are getting worse) and plenty of common people drive.

Expand full comment
JanusIanitos's avatar

Public transit is expensive.

Boston's T was doing quite horribly as recently as last year. It still cost billions upon billions of dollars to function even at that unimpressive level. It needed even more funding. It got a partial infusion of funding to catch up on decades of lapsed maintenance — and new leadership, which was absolutely critical — and the system is doing far better right now, with further improvements planned through 2027 if the funding can be maintained to enable those improvements (not certain).

NYC's subway needs are far greater than Boston's and will consequently cost far more too. I wouldn't be shocked if the MTA could seriously benefit from a change in leadership, but often insufficient funding is the core issue facing these kinds of systems.

Expand full comment
Tigercourse's avatar

I mean, your last paragraph is the issue. The MTA needs reform, but it isn't going to get it, so people feel like they are paying a lot of money for nothing. It's not going to be popular with them. That's it. Like everything, we'll see how that negatively affects us politically.

Expand full comment
ErrorError