Golden is a pain in the ass but he's undeniably better than any republican in congress this century. He's generally there when we really need his vote. The difficulty with him is damaging our messaging more than anything.
I'll continue to be annoyed with him but I'd rather have him than a republican any day of the week. Even while annoyin…
Golden is a pain in the ass but he's undeniably better than any republican in congress this century. He's generally there when we really need his vote. The difficulty with him is damaging our messaging more than anything.
I'll continue to be annoyed with him but I'd rather have him than a republican any day of the week. Even while annoying I'm glad we have him.
If the only thing he ever does for us is provide a vote for a dem speaker, he will be better than a republican.
Disagree-Golden already is a Republican (just not in Party ID), and if he's not, he's no better than one-I'd rather lose the seat than have him in the house.
He voted for the IRA, which zero republicans in the house and senate did. He supports abortion rights. He's in favor of gun control now, even if he wasn't earlier. He voted for Jeffries to be speaker.
I'm not going to pretend this is some high bar to clear. It isn't. He's the biggest pain in the ass in our congressional caucus and he routinely finds ways to piss us off. He makes tons of bad votes.
But he is clearly and unambiguously to the left of every elected republican in congress right now. He is not a republican. In a country with more than two functioning political parties he wouldn't be a democrat either, and would likely align with a center-right or centrist party. That isn't what the US has though and he is easily better than every republican in congress.
Put another way: What republican member of the house do you think is no worse than him? If he is a de facto republican then there should be a republican with a similar voting record out there. What republican voted for the IRA and to make Jeffries speaker?
I agree with this comment and any Democrats is useful in a Republicans seat than an actual Republican but here's his phony populism on rejecting Build Back Better:
Golden is a pain in the ass but he's undeniably better than any republican in congress this century. He's generally there when we really need his vote. The difficulty with him is damaging our messaging more than anything.
I'll continue to be annoyed with him but I'd rather have him than a republican any day of the week. Even while annoying I'm glad we have him.
If the only thing he ever does for us is provide a vote for a dem speaker, he will be better than a republican.
Disagree-Golden already is a Republican (just not in Party ID), and if he's not, he's no better than one-I'd rather lose the seat than have him in the house.
No Republican has ever voted 90% of the time for Biden’s policies or for a Democratic House Speaker. Just saying.
He voted for the IRA, which zero republicans in the house and senate did. He supports abortion rights. He's in favor of gun control now, even if he wasn't earlier. He voted for Jeffries to be speaker.
I'm not going to pretend this is some high bar to clear. It isn't. He's the biggest pain in the ass in our congressional caucus and he routinely finds ways to piss us off. He makes tons of bad votes.
But he is clearly and unambiguously to the left of every elected republican in congress right now. He is not a republican. In a country with more than two functioning political parties he wouldn't be a democrat either, and would likely align with a center-right or centrist party. That isn't what the US has though and he is easily better than every republican in congress.
Put another way: What republican member of the house do you think is no worse than him? If he is a de facto republican then there should be a republican with a similar voting record out there. What republican voted for the IRA and to make Jeffries speaker?
He wouldn't have done any of those things if Republicans needed his vote
Well, just because you say so, it must be true.
I agree with this comment and any Democrats is useful in a Republicans seat than an actual Republican but here's his phony populism on rejecting Build Back Better:
https://golden.house.gov/media/press-releases/golden-opposes-tax-breaks-millionaires-commits-working-senate-improve-build
This is nonsense. You'd rather lose the seat? Why on earth would you want to take a vote away from a potential D speakership. C'mon man...
Either way it's a vote for a Republican Speaker