I'd add: even if the difference is solely on voter suppression, the back to back losses preclude her making another credible run. Voters give a penalty to candidates that have lost high profile elections. Easy example to my mind: Martha Coakley probably would have won the 2014 gubernatorial election if she hadn't lost the 2010 senate spe…
I'd add: even if the difference is solely on voter suppression, the back to back losses preclude her making another credible run. Voters give a penalty to candidates that have lost high profile elections. Easy example to my mind: Martha Coakley probably would have won the 2014 gubernatorial election if she hadn't lost the 2010 senate special.
Abrams will be tarred with her recent defeats if she runs for something else. It's a problem other candidates face. She put in good efforts and did a lot of great work helping us in Georgia, but I cannot see her as our strongest candidate for statewide office.
I'd add: even if the difference is solely on voter suppression, the back to back losses preclude her making another credible run. Voters give a penalty to candidates that have lost high profile elections. Easy example to my mind: Martha Coakley probably would have won the 2014 gubernatorial election if she hadn't lost the 2010 senate special.
Abrams will be tarred with her recent defeats if she runs for something else. It's a problem other candidates face. She put in good efforts and did a lot of great work helping us in Georgia, but I cannot see her as our strongest candidate for statewide office.
I think there were quite a few Kemp-Warnock votes in 2022.