That makes no sense. Schumer had the majority--"what was available" were a series of votes where Democrats outvoted Republicans each time. I agree that some of the nominees wouldn't have made it--Mangi and Park seemed the most vulnerable, and something happened with Kanter that she never got an ABA evaluation--but Democrats had the votes for the others. Campbell would have been a party line vote, and as I said, Collins should have been forced to take a stand one way or the other on Lipez. As it is, it's questionable that they get Murillo and Cheeks, who should have been part of the deal.
not an ad hominem attack; an honest evaluation; but I am sure you will keep responding but that's ok cause I'm done reading any more of your inane posts; CheersЁЯН╗
wrong again; it's what was available
That makes no sense. Schumer had the majority--"what was available" were a series of votes where Democrats outvoted Republicans each time. I agree that some of the nominees wouldn't have made it--Mangi and Park seemed the most vulnerable, and something happened with Kanter that she never got an ABA evaluation--but Democrats had the votes for the others. Campbell would have been a party line vote, and as I said, Collins should have been forced to take a stand one way or the other on Lipez. As it is, it's questionable that they get Murillo and Cheeks, who should have been part of the deal.
As usual, you make no sense; your naivete of how actual politics works is sad or laughable depending on ones sense of humor
Ad hominem attacks are usually a sign that someone doesn't have a good argument.
not an ad hominem attack; an honest evaluation; but I am sure you will keep responding but that's ok cause I'm done reading any more of your inane posts; CheersЁЯН╗
Schumer has a nominal majority. But do we know whether Manchin and Sinema would have gone along?
Of course not.that deal was as good as it gets. our side lost, reality should set in, but with this poser above, unicorns I guess must be real