The Downballot's 3Q 2025 Senate and House fundraising reports roundup
We've rounded up data for more than 800 notable candidates for Congress

Quarterly fundraising reports for congressional candidates covering the period from July 1 to Sept. 30 were due at the Federal Election Commission on Oct. 15 by midnight ET.
Below are our charts of fundraising data for every incumbent in the Senate and House seeking reelection, as well as notable non-incumbents. All numbers are in thousands.
To see each chart in full, click on the bottom where it reads “+ Show ___ more.” Note that you may need to scroll horizontally to see some columns. An explanation of each column can be found below the charts.
You can also find versions of these charts in spreadsheet form for both the Senate and the House.
This week, we’re marking 22 years since the launch of the Swing State Project—the site that became The Downballot—and we’re celebrating by offering 22% off our normal subscription price!
No one compiles fundraising charts as thorough and clear as ours, but they take a ton of work! We’d be incredibly grateful if you could support our efforts by becoming a paid subscriber. This week, you can do so for just $47 a year instead of our usual rate of $60. Thank you so kindly!
Senate
House
Notes: Some candidates in California have said they intend to run for the House should voters approve a new congressional map in a special election on Nov. 4. These candidates are marked with “(proposed)” below their district numbers.
Candidates running in the special election for Texas’ 18th District have until Oct. 23 to file new fundraising reports.
Below is an explanation of each column:
Under “Party,” a designation including “-inc” refers to an incumbent.
“3Q Raised“ is the amount the campaign received in donations from donors during the reporting period. This includes transfers from other committees but does not include any self-funding or loans.
“Self-Fund“ is the amount in contributions and/or loans a candidate made to their own campaign using their personal resources during the reporting period. This number, if any, is not included in the “Raised” column.
“Spent“ is the amount of money the campaign spent during the reporting period.
“Cash“ is the total cash on hand the campaign had available at the end of the reporting period.
“Raised CTD“ is the amount the campaign had received in donations from donors for the cycle to date as of the end of the reporting period. This includes transfers from other committees but does not include any self-funding or loans.
“Self-Fund CTD“ is the amount in contributions and/or loans a candidate had made to their own campaign using their personal resources for the cycle to date during the reporting period. This number, if any, is not counted in the “Raised CTD” column.
“Spent CTD“ is the amount of money the campaign had spent for the cycle to date as of the end of the reporting period.
“Transfer“ is the amount in monetary transfers from other political committees during the reporting period. This number, if any, is included in the “Raised” column.
“Transfer CTD“ is the amount in monetary transfers from other political committees for the cycle to date as of the end of the reporting period. This number, if any, is included in the “Raised CTD” column.
Ultimately, all money received from all sources is reflected in every candidate’s cash-on-hand totals, less spending.
You can also find our charts for earlier quarters this cycle: 1Q | 2Q.
For fundraising charts from previous election cycles, please visit the-downballot.com/data.


TX-Sen: Ken Paxton's Raised CTD is showing as $0, I assume that's an error?
This may be beyond The Downballot's data-driven mission, but is there a good list combining winnability scores and cash needs to tell us where our cash should go, now and/or later? Sure-things in either direction are not what I want to spend a lot of money on - though sending a bit to Dems brave enough to run with no hope of winning is something I do. A chart combining closeness of the race with cash held/needed/something would be of interest - especially a ranked one.