Discussion about this post

User's avatar
MPC's avatar
1hEdited

I loved that podcast interview with Colom. He's on point, highly qualified and relentlessly attacking Hyde-Smith as "High Prices." And he's right on the math statement.

If I could pick an upset Senate loss this year, Hyde-Smith would be in my top 3.

the lurking ecologist's avatar

Also interesting to game out the competition for Dr. Andrews now in SC. My gut said she was better running against Graham because there are many Rs who dislike him. But he dispatched Mark Lynch and Thomas Dismukes pretty easily. So probably better for Andrews now.

Lynch was damaged pretty badly by Graham. I'm surprised he didn't dent Graham more. And Lynch is very far right. Doubt he can beat Norman in a primary but Lynch wouldn't be a strong candidate vs Andrews.

Nancy Mace is likely to run and that would be a tasty race vs Dr Andrews. Mace will default to her worst instincts about trans and gay bashing because she's done that with Andrews before. Andrews could turn a lot of female voters against Mace. Easily Andrew's preferred opponent, I'd think.

I think Evette would be the strongest candidate against Andrews, but considering how little support she got in the run off, maybe Rs don't like her as much as I thought. Or they're just sexist.

Norman is probably the strongest R who could run. He has DC experience and Maga bona fides and just did reasonably well in Gov race, but only 5% better than Mace. If Dr Andrews is correct and the Nikki Haley Rs in the state are ready to jump ship from the Maga right, then that could be a problem. But he's older than Graham was.

Fry is Norman but younger + and less well known -.

Regardless, I think Andrews loses, but she has a better shot now. As to which R candidate will win...search me...as the Gen X kids said back in the day.

1 more comment...

No posts

Ready for more?